The BBC is reporting of a warning to schools regarding
this year’s forthcoming A Level and GCSE results. However, on closer scrutiny, it is difficult
to figure out what the warning actually is....
It seems that there are
rumblings of great variations in results this year. Greater variations of what though? Greater variations between teacher prediction
and actual attainment? Greater
variations between school’s expected and historical results and what they
attain this year? Or greater variation
of student attainment across the subjects they have taken….or all three?
To muddy the waters more
there is further contradiction. Glenys
Stacey (Chief regulator for Ofqual) says that standards would be “held steady”. To me, this means that a student who got a “C”
last year should get a “C” this year.
But, where is the variation in that?
Encouragingly, Stacey then goes onto say, “Overall, results are likely to
look different because of the difference in entry patterns”.
The only difference in
entry patterns is that many schools have cancelled their plans to enter Yr 10
students for the GCSE exam as it was claimed by some (principally Ofsted and
Ofqual), though I never agreed with it, that entering students early for their
maths exam did not result in greater attainment by the end of Yr 11.
So, following Ofqual and
Ofsted’s logic, reducing the number of Yr 10 students sitting the exam should result
in higher attainment for those in Year 11 this summer – especially as most Yr
11 students will not have been “damaged” by the historical early entry
opportunities of the November, January and March sittings.
But every teacher knows
that would be a foolish and dangerous assumption.
Confused? So am I.
And as the countdown to
the results continues, us teachers wait for the traditional shrieks of joy and
tears of despair, knowing that we too are receiving our judgement.
No comments:
Post a Comment